For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and ratemywifey.com uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to expand his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, pipewiki.org and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative functions must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them certify their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, pyra-handheld.com companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector yogaasanas.science to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.